Change Means Friction
Every day we are faced with a wide range of decisions that affect every aspect of our lives. With so many choices, it is important to note that they are not all the same. Some follow standard routines and habits, while others require more thought and deliberation before reaching a final decision.
Cognitive conflict describes our mental state when we are confronted with new information that clashes with our existing experiences, attitudes, beliefs, and habits. It is a critical component of decision making and a key driver in shifting from habitual, mindless choices to more thoughtful, conscious choices, which can ultimately lead to behavioural change.
In this Ipsos Views paper we explore why cognitive conflict matters and what measures are available to help us better understand people’s decisions, drawing on case studies to illustrate how closely cognitive conflict is linked to behaviour change.
In particular, the paper focuses on Decision Process Tracing, a proprietary and patented solution developed by Ipsos. This methodology measures the amount of conflict present in a decision by analysing the physical path of a trace that people make when choosing between two options. It can distinguish heuristic brand selection from more deliberative brand choice, including identifying the different types of evaluation across different brands by the same individuals in the same category. It has also been able to identify where significant numbers of people’s stated preferences are conflicted, and prone to change, such as in the choice of election candidates.
By understanding and leveraging cognitive conflict, businesses and policymakers can develop more effective strategies for driving positive change in consumer behaviour, social attitudes, and more.
Key takeaways: