• Ipsos
  • Accessibility Statement

Accessibility Statement

SELECT A RUBRIC

Ipsos undertakes to make its website accessible in accordance with Article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005, as last amended by Executive Order No 2023-859 of 6 September 2023.

To this end, it commits to developing a multi-year plan to define the strategy and actions Ipsos will undertake to ensure its compliance.

This declaration of accessibility applies to ipsos.com.

Compliance Status

The ipsos.com site is not compliant with RGAA 4.1 Double-A (AA) level due to the non-conformities and deviations listed below. 

Ipsos is committed to improving the accessibility of its website and is working on a comprehensive remediation plan to address non-compliant elements. This plan includes prioritising the resolution of key accessibility issues to ensure better support for all users, including those with disabilities.

Test Results

The compliance audit carried out by Ipedis reveals that the compliance rate is 37.88%.

  • 25 compliant criteria 
  • 41 non-compliant criteria 
  • 40 non-applicable criteria


Non-accessible content

The contents listed below are not accessible for the following reasons.

Non-compliance
Several elements of non-compliance are described in this document, some of which are recurrent on several pages:

  • Some decorative images are not ignored by screen readers.  
  • Some textual alternatives for informative images are incomplete.  
  • Some complex images lack detailed descriptions.  
  • Some iframe elements do not have a title attribute.  
  • In certain situations, colours are used exclusively to convey information, indicate actions, prompt responses, or differentiate visual elements.  
  • Some text colours do not have sufficient contrast with their backgrounds.  
  • Some visual component colours lack adequate contrast with their backgrounds.  
  • Some media content (audio, video) does not include transcripts or audio descriptions.  
  • Layout tables become incomprehensible when vocalised.
  • Table headers are not correctly tagged.  
  • Some links, even when combined with their context, fail to describe their purpose or destination.  
  • Some links do not have a label.  
  • Certain scripts cannot be rendered by assistive technologies.  
  • Some scripts are not controllable via the keyboard.  
  • Some context changes occur without providing users with advanced warning.  
  • Some status messages are not properly announced by assistive technologies.  
  • Some pages do not validate against formal specifications (e.g., mismatched tags, duplicate attributes, or non-unique IDs).  
  • Some language changes are not indicated.  
  • Semantic HTML elements are misused for presentation purposes.  
  • On some pages, the information is not organised using appropriate headings.  
  • Some pages lack ARIA landmarks to clearly define their regions.  
  • Some lists are not properly marked as such.  
  • Quotes are not correctly tagged.  
  • HTML is sometimes used instead of CSS to set text presentation.  
  • Some information or functionality is lost when CSS is disabled.  
  • Foreground colours are specified without corresponding background colours.  
  • Focus indicators are not visible.  
  • Some intentionally hidden content is incorrectly exposed to screen readers.  
  • Some information is conveyed solely through its shape, size, or location.  
  • Some form fields lack explicitly associated labels.  
  • Some form fields do not provide descriptive labels.  
  • Some logically related form fields are not grouped together.  
  • Some form fields do not properly control data entry.  
  • For some form fields, if an input error is detected, the user is not adequately guided to identify and correct it.  
  • Some form fields that request user information do not have the correct autocomplete attribute values.  
  • Some pages do not employ multiple navigation, such as a menu, site map, or a complete search function.  
  • Some sections of pages are not tagged with the appropriate ARIA landmark roles.  
  • Some pages lack a functioning skip link to bypass the header and jump directly to the main content.  
  • On some pages, the tab order does not reflect the logical relationships within the content.  
  • Some downloadable documents are inaccessible and do not provide an accessible alternative.  
  • Graphs with automatically moving, blinking, or scrolling content cannot be controlled by the user.

Derogations for disproportionate burden
No derogation identified. 

Content not subject to the obligation of accessibility
No content not subject to the accessibility obligation identified

Establishment of this declaration of accessibility

This statement was made on 20/02/2025.

Technologies used for the website development:

  • HTML5 
  • CSS 
  • JavaScript

The tests of the web pages were performed with the following combinations of user agents and screen readers:

  • NVDA with Google Chrome

The following tools were used in the evaluation: 

  • Web Developer Toolbar
  • WAVE
  • WCAG – Constrast checker
  • Accessible Color Picker
  • Taba11y
  • Axe DevTools – Web Accessibility Testing
  • Assistant RGAA
  • PDF Accessibility Checker (PAC) 2021

Pages of the site having been the subject of the verification of conformity: 

  • Home page
  • Legal mentions
  • Accessibility statement
  • Search
  • Contact
  • Share price
  • About us
  • Our solutions
  • What Worries the World


Feedback and contact

If you are unable to access any content or service, you can contact the website manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another form.

Contact the communication department of Ipsos at the following email address: [email protected].

Contact Channels

This procedure is to be applied in the following case:

You have reported to the website manager a lack of accessibility that prevents you from accessing any of the content or services of the portal and you have not received a satisfactory response.