Six in ten around the world think their society is ‘broken’ Eight in ten on average lack confidence in political parties One in three say their country would be stronger if immigration was stopped
New data from Ipsos Global @dvisor shows that many across 23 countries around the world think that their society is broken, while feeling a lack of confidence in establishment institutions - especially political parties, governments and the media.
The survey, among online adults aged under 65 in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Britain, Germany, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States also finds a majority support prioritising hiring nationals over immigrants when jobs are scarce (although views are split on ending immigration), and that people say they are more likely to support a party or political leader who promises to radically change the status quo than one who has been in power before. This is supported by new analysis from Ipsos Public Affairs that suggests that in some countries, especially in continental Europe, political discontent is strongly associated with nativist sentiment, but this is not the case everywhere.
Is there a sense of alarmism?
- A majority in 17 of the 23 countries feel that ‘society is broken’ (and 58% on average), especially high in Poland, Spain, Brazil, and Mexico.
- On average, 38% say that nowadays they feel a stranger in their own country, while 35% disagree. This feeling is stronger in Turkey, South Africa and Brazil, and among Western countries most prevalent in Italy, Belgium and the US.
- On average, 45% agree that terrorism should be stopped at all costs even if that means ignoring people’s civil rights (28% disagree). Countries with recent experience of terrorism such as Turkey, France, India, Israel and Belgium are particularly likely to support this approach, as is Serbia.
Confidence in institutions
- On average, eight in ten (81%) across the 23 countries lack confidence in political parties (a majority in every country), and 71% lack confidence in their government. In both cases, confidence is particularly low in Spain and Mexico.
- Two in three (68%) lack confidence in the media, rising to at least three-quarters in Hungary, Serbia, Spain, Mexico, Great Britain and Israel.
- 61% on average lack confidence in big companies, and 59% lack confidence in banks. Confidence in banks is especially low in Spain and Italy – and also Germany.
- Six in ten (59%) lack confidence in the judicial system/the courts. There are big differences by country – over eight in ten in Argentina, Peru and Mexico lack confidence in their judicial system.
- Half (52%) say they lack confidence in international institutions – particularly so in continental Europe (Spain, France, Italy, Serbia and Belgium), and also in Israel.
- On average, a majority (56%) think that employers should prioritise hiring nationals over immigrants when jobs are scarce, especially in Serbia, Hungary, Turkey and Israel. Over four in ten (44%) also believe that their country should prioritise hiring nationals over foreigners even if that means slower job growth, rising to seven in ten in Turkey (although over half of Swedes disagree).
- Having said that, there are as many concerns over immigrants’ impact on social services as on jobs (by 39% to 35%), especially in European countries.
- Few support uncontrolled immigration (just 14% on average), while views are split on stopping immigration. A third (34%) think their country would be stronger if immigration was stopped (higher in Turkey, Israel and Hungary), but a similar proportion (36%) disagree (highest in Sweden and Canada).
Are populist positions vote-winners?
- A number of so-called “populist” positions are attractive to voters. In particular, 63% on average say they would be more likely to vote for a political party or leader who ‘stands up for the common people against the elite’, and people say they are more likely to vote for a political party or leader who wants to radically change the status quo than one who has been in power before, by 44% to 18%.
- However, several so-called ‘pluralist’ positions are just as popular. 67% say they would be more likely to vote for a political party or leader who listens to alternative points of view, 56% for one who is prepared to make compromises, and 52% for one who will stand up for the rights of minorities.
What does discontent mean in different countries?
New analysis from Ipsos Public Affairs also helps show that while many countries feel discontent, it is mistaken to assume the same issues matter everywhere across the world. Previous Ipsos research has demonstrated that as well as a majority thinking their system is in decline, public opinion in many countries feels that traditional political actors don’t care about people like them, that experts don’t understand their lives, and that their economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful – a mood that can be summed up as “the system is broken”. However, the local conditions associated with this unhappiness are not always the same.
As the chart below shows, in several continental European countries such as France, Italy and Hungary, there is a strong sense of political dissatisfaction, which is also associated with high levels of ‘nativist’ sentiment – a belief, for example, that immigrants take jobs and important social services away from locally-born nationals. This pattern can also be observed in Turkey. However, some other countries with equally high levels of belief that “the system is broken” have much lower nativist sentiment – such as the LATAM countries of Mexico and Peru, and also in South Korea.
Commenting on the findings, Gideon Skinner, Head of Political Research at Ipsos MORI said:
“These findings reveal a worrying lack of confidence in the traditional political establishment around the world – although it was probably never that high – and not much more confidence in other key institutions such as the media, courts, or big business either. But our analysis suggests that we shouldn’t make lazy assumptions about the drivers of discontent being the same around the world, and nor should everything be lumped together under a ‘populism’ banner (for example, views on immigration vary, and there is no majority for stopping it altogether). The reality is more complex, so it is vital to understand the local context too.”
- This data is part of a substantial study into the attitudes and drivers of the political mood around the world, being carried out by Ipsos. Ipsos’ polling experts from around the world are discussing the results at a major debate called Power to the people? Beyond populism to be held on Tuesday 31st January 2017. More details here.
- In total 16,597 interviews were conducted between October 21 – November 4 2016 among adults aged 18-64 in the US and Canada, and adults aged 16-64 in all other countries. The survey was conducted in 23 countries around the world via the Ipsos Online Panel system (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United States of America). Data are weighted to match the profile of the population (6 of the countries surveyed – Brazil, India, Mexico, Peru, South Africa and Turkey - have lower levels of internet connectivity and so the results reflect online populations that tend to be more urban and have higher education/income than the general population).
One in three people in Scotland live in homes that do not meet the Living Home Standard
Created in 2016, The Living Home Standard represents what ‘home’ means, and what an acceptable home should provide. It has been defined by the public, for the public. This year, the study has been repeated, measuring the proportion of people living in homes that pass and fail the Living Home Standard in Scotland.