Who Is and Is Not a “Real American”, a “Real Brazilian” or a “Real Chinese”?
Ipsos’s Inclusiveness Index compares countries’ acceptance of social and cultural diversity.
An Ipsos Global Advisor survey shows Canada and the United States have the most inclusive definition of nationality, followed by South Africa, France, and Australia. These countries score highest on an Inclusiveness Index reflecting social acceptance of diversity as it applies to religion, immigration, sexual orientation and gender identity, political views, and criminal background.
Overall Inclusiveness Index |
||||||||
Canada |
55 |
|
Great Britain |
35 |
|
South Korea |
9 |
|
United States |
54 |
|
Mexico |
33 |
|
Russia |
9 |
|
South Africa |
52 |
|
Belgium |
30 |
|
Hungary |
6 |
|
France |
46 |
|
Poland |
24 |
|
Turkey |
-6 |
|
Australia |
44 |
|
Italy |
22 |
|
Japan |
-6 |
|
Chile |
42 |
|
Brazil |
22 |
|
Serbia |
-8 |
|
Argentina |
40 |
|
Germany |
20 |
|
Malaysia |
-17 |
|
Sweden |
38 |
|
Peru |
19 |
|
Saudi Arabia |
-28 |
|
Spain |
36 |
|
The Overall Inclusiveness Index is based on the findings of an Ipsos Global Advisor survey conducted in April and May 2018. For the study, Ipsos interviewed over 20,700 men and women in 27 countries about as many as 28 types of people. For each type, respondents were asked if they consider such a person to be a “real” national (e.g., “a real American” in the U.S., “a real Brazilian” in Brazil, etc.) or not. The Overall Inclusiveness Index is calculated by averaging the net scores (“real” percentage minus “not real” percentage) for six constructs:
- Religious Inclusiveness (average of net scores for each of Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, and atheists) – led by France and Canada;
- Naturalized-Citizen Inclusiveness (net score for naturalized citizens) – led by the U.S. and Australia;
- Second Generation Inclusiveness (average of net scores for native-born people whose parents immigrated from nine different regions of the world) – led by Canada and Chile;
- LGBT Inclusiveness (net score for gays, lesbians, bisexual and transgender people) – led by France and Canada;
- Criminal Background Inclusiveness (net score for people who have been convicted and incarcerated) – led by Canada and South Africa; and
- Extreme Political Views Inclusiveness (net score for people with extreme political views) – led by South Africa and the U.S.
For benchmarking purposes, the study also explores inclusiveness of people who served in the country’s armed forces (it is highest in the U.S.) and self-perception of locals as “real” nationals (it is most common in China and India).
The study also explores the nature and prevalence of international experience and international connections among people from each country. Serbia and Sweden stand out as the two countries in the study whose citizens are most likely to have lived or traveled abroad and to have personal or professional connections with people from or living in another country.