Washington, DC - A new Ipsos global survey highlights how wrong the public across 14 countries are about the scale of the basic make-up of their populations- and how the United States scores against the other 13, finishing in second-to-last place.
For the unique "perceptions versus facts" test about knowledge of social-demographic aspects in their own country, Americans fail on 9 out of 9 measures. Simply put, the overall perceptions of their country on these measures versus the realities just don't add up--and that can cause the public to be misinformed on what it surmises or advocates on various topics or issues. The closest near miss is on perceptions of voter turnout which was by just a -.9 gap.
The countries measured were Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, and the United States.
For the 14 countries surveyed, Ipsos asked respondents to `guesstimate' certain verifiable facts as a percentage or as a true/false statement, and then compared these perceptions to the reality. We then ranked a country's accuracy by comparing these perceptions to the verified facts. The survey was carried out online using the Ipsos international respondent panel system.
Residents from each country surveyed, including US, can take their own interactive test at:
The Country Accuracy Rankings: Perceptions versus Realities...
In the US we get a lot of things very wrong...
1. Ageing population: we over-estimate the US population as much older than it actually is - the average estimate is that 35.9% of the population is 65+, when it is in fact only 14%-- a perception gap of -21.9 points.
2. Christians: in contrast, we underestimate the proportion of Christians - Americans think just over half (55.7%) of the country identify themselves as Christian compared with the actual figure of 78%%--a perception gap of -22.3 points.
3. Muslims: we hugely over-estimate the proportion of Muslims in the US - we think one in seven (15%) of people are Muslims when the actual figure is 1%--a perception gap of -14.4 points.
4. Unemployment: Americans over-estimate that nearly 32.1% of the working age population is unemployed when the actual figure is much lower at 6%-- a perception gap of -26.1 points.
5. Murder rate: Americans are dead wrong on their murder rate with 51% saying it is rising (which is incorrect) whereas only 30% think it is falling (which is correct) and 18% say they don't know--a perception gap of -21 points.
6. Teenage pregnancy: Americans over-estimate that one quarter (23.9%) of all teenage girls aged 15-19 give birth each year, when the actual figure is only 3.1%-- a perception gap of -20.8 points.
7. Immigration: Americans over-estimate that 32.3% of the population are immigrants while the real figure is 13%-- a perception gap of -19.3 points.
8. Voting: Americans just underestimate the proportion of the electorate that voted in the last general election - the average guess is 57.1% when the official turnout was a paper thin higher at 58%-- a perception gap of .9 points.
9. Life expectancy: Americans underestimate our life expectancy thinking the average for a child born in 2014 will be 78.1 years, when the actual estimate is 80 years-- a perception gap of -1.9 points.
But the rest of the world gets it wrong too...
1. Teenage birth rates: on average, people across the 14 countries think that 15% of teenagers aged 15-19 give birth each year. This is 12 times higher than the average official estimate of 1.2% across these countries. But other countries with very low rates of teenage births are further out proportionally: for example, Germans think that 14% of teenage girls give birth each year when it's actually only 0.4% (35x the actual figure).
2. Muslims: people across just about all countries hugely overestimate the proportion of their population that are Muslim: the average guess across the countries is 16% when the actual proportion is 3%. For example, on average people in France think 31% of the population is Muslim, when the actual figure is only 8%. In Australia the average guess is nine times the actual proportion: people estimate it at 18%, when the actual proportion is only 2%.
3. Christians: in contrast, majority-Christian countries tend to underestimate how many people count themselves as Christian. In the 12 majority-Christian countries in the survey, the average guess is 51%, when the actual proportion counting themselves as Christians is 61%. This includes countries like the US where people think 56% are Christian when official data shows it is 78%.
4. Immigration: across the 14 countries, the public think immigration is over twice the actual level - the average guess is that 24% of the population was born abroad, when the actual figure is 11%. This includes some massive overestimates: the US public think 32% of the population are immigrants when the actual is 13%; in Italy the public think 30% are immigrants when it's actually 7%; and in Belgium the public think it's 29% when it's actually 10%.
5. Ageing population: we think the population is much older than it actually is - the average estimate is that 39% of the population is 65+, when only 18% are. Italians are particularly wrong on this - on average, they think nearly half the population (48%) are 65+, when it is actually 21%.
6. Voting: every country in the study underestimates the proportion of the electorate who voted in their last major election. The average guess is that 58% voted, when in fact 72% did. The French in particular are too pessimistic about the extent of democratic engagement: estimating that only 57% of the electorate voted in the Presidential election, when in fact 80% did.
7. Unemployment: people tend to greatly overestimate the extent of unemployment in their countries. The average guess is 30%, when the actual figure is 9%. This includes some huge overestimates, for example in Italy, where the average guess is that 49% are unemployed, compared with an actual rate of 12%.
8. Life expectancy: this is one area where on average we have a much better grasp of reality. Across the 14 countries, the average life expectancy for a child born this year is estimated to be 80 years, when across these countries as a whole it's actually 81 years. However, there is still a wide range between countries: people in South Korea are too optimistic, expecting the average life expectancy to be 89 years, compared with an actual of 80 years; but Hungarians are too pessimistic, only expecting 68 years, when the average is predicted to be 75 years.
9. Murder rates: 49% of people across the countries think that the murder rate is rising and only 27% think it is falling - when in fact in all countries in the study, the murder rate is actually falling. The British are the most likely to have an accurate view of murder rate trends: 49% think it's falling and only 25% think it's rising.
These are the findings of the Ipsos MORI Perils of Perception Survey. 11,527 interviews were conducted between conducted between August 12th and August 26th 2014. The survey was conducted in 14 countries around the world via the Ipsos Online Panel system in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Great Britain and the United States of America. In the US and Canada respondents are aged 18-64, and 16-64 in all other countries. Approximately 1000+ individuals were surveyed in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, Great Britain and the United States of America. Approximately 500+ individuals were surveyed in the remaining countries. Where results do not sum to 100, this may be due to computer rounding, multiple responses or the exclusion of don't knows or not stated responses. Data are weighted to match the profile of the population. The precision of Ipsos online polls are calculated using a credibility interval. In this case, a poll of 1,000 is accurate to +/- 3.5 percentage points and one of 500 is accurate to +/- 5.0 percentage points in their respective general populations. There are 15 countries that have been weighted to represent their actual adult population: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and the United States. The remaining nine country results are representative of adult Primary Consumers who are internet enabled and have a higher income and education than the average country norm.
For more information on this news release, please contact:
Julia Clark Vice President Ipsos Public Affairs (312) 526-4919 julia.clark@Ipsos.com
The ranking for each country was calculated as follows: For each item that were measured as percentages (a number out of 100): an accuracy score for each country was calculated as the difference between the mean of the survey estimate and the actual value. The accuracy score was then `standardized' (adjusted) to acknowledge that a difference for a small (or large) prevalence should be treated differently to the same-sized difference around a prevalence nearer 50%: for example, a difference between 5% and 10% would be considered to be of lower accuracy compared with a difference between 45% and 50%. This standardization was done by calculating the equivalent accuracy score around an estimate of 50% for each country. For example, for a accuracy score of 5% between 5% and 10%, the standardized accuracy score around an estimate of 50% was calculated to be 9.5% (i.e. the difference between 45.25% and 54.75%). The countries were then ranked based on the standardized accuracy score.
For the measure of average life expectancy, the countries were ranked on the raw accuracy score - no standardization was carried out. This is because average life expectancy is a discrete measure rather than a percentage.
For the indicator of whether the murder rate was rising or not, the countries were ranked in order of the proportion of respondents in that country that reported that the rate was rising. In all the countries the rate is actually falling so, the lower the proportion of respondent in the country that reported it was rising, the more accurate the perception. (Whether the murder rate is rising or falling was classified as `unclear' in South Korea. As it is falling for all the other countries, we assumed it was also falling in South Korea).
Each country was ranked for each item as described above: 1 for the most accurate through to 14 for the least accurate perception. The individual ranks for the items were then added to together for each country. This sum of the ranks was then used to rank the countries over all the measures: the country with the lowest sum of the ranks having the most accurate perception overall and hence being ranked 1.
The Standardization Approach
Mean survey measure = Ps
Actual measure = Pa
Accuracy score = | Ps - Pa |
Mid-point of measures = Pm = ( Ps + Pa ) / 2
Spread around mid-point of measures (sdm) = v(P_mЧ(100-P_m))
Spread around 50% (sd50%) = v(50Ч(100-50)) = 50
Standardized accuracy score = | Ps - Pa | x ( sd50% / sdm ) = | Ps - Pa | x ( 50 / sdm )
Note to Editors: For further International (non-specific country) information, please contact Hannah Millard email@example.com | +44 (0) 207 347 3452 | Ipsos MORI, London, Great Britain
Ipsos is an independent market research company controlled and managed by research professionals. Founded in France in 1975, Ipsos has grown into a worldwide research group with a strong presence in all key markets. Ipsos ranks third in the global research industry.
With offices in 86 countries, Ipsos delivers insightful expertise across six research specializations: advertising, customer loyalty, marketing, media, public affairs research, and survey management.
Ipsos researchers assess market potential and interpret market trends. They develop and build brands. They help clients build long-term relationships with their customers. They test advertising and study audience responses to various media and they measure public opinion around the globe.
Ipsos has been listed on the Paris Stock Exchange since 1999 and generated global revenues of e1,712,4 million (2 274 M$) in 2013.
Visit www.ipsos.com to learn more about Ipsos' offerings and capabilities.