Competence matters. Perceptions of leader competence in handling of COVID-19 tend to mirror country experience.

In a new report ‘Political Trust and the COVID-19 Crisis: Pushing Populism to the Backburner', researchers from the Universities of Southampton, Canberra and Oxford find that perceptions of the threat posed by the coronavirus and performance of political leaders tend to correspond to how the crisis has unfolded in each country.

The author(s)

  • Ben Page Chief Executive, Ipsos MORI
  • Keiran Pedley Public Affairs
Get in touch

The ESRC-funded TrustGov project and Museum of Australian Democracy teamed up to conduct online national surveys, fielded by pollsters Ipsos MORI in May and June 2020, in Australia, Italy, the UK and the USA.

The surveys reveal that the public’s assessment of the level of threat posed by the coronavirus and trust in government and political leaders tends to correspond to the actual experiences of citizens in the four countries. 

  • Citizens’ perception of the threat of the virus to themselves personally is highest in the UK (the country where the rate of deaths per capita is highest); while concerns about the economic threat are somewhat greater in the UK and Italy (countries subject to tighter containment measures than others) when compared to the US and Australia.
  • Concern about national threat posed by the virus is highest in the UK (reflecting the magnitude of the outbreak to date). Two-thirds of Britons consider the virus a ‘high’ or ‘very high’ threat compared to 6 in 10 in the U.S. and Italy and just 1 in 3 in Australia.
  • According to the research, citizens tend to look more positively on those politicians who are perceived to listen to extra governmental views in organising their response to the pandemic.
  • Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison is well ahead in terms of being viewed as competent in his handling of the outbreak, followed by Giuseppe Conte, then Boris Johnson, and then, Donald Trump.

The process of judging the competence of political elites in the context of COVID-19 is more than a crude judgment about threat and outcomes. It reflects how the leader is perceived to have managed the process and their relationships with other stakeholders and interests. 
Evaluations of leader handling of Covid-19

  • The leaders that are most likely to have been seen to use expert advice, been open and transparent and have been capable of working with others are generally seen to have also handled the outbreak most effectively. 
  • President Trump stands out as receiving the lowest marks from the public. Majorities of the public in Australia, Italy and the UK viewed their leaders as consulting with experts and others in government in their handling of the pandemic, but only a third consider listening to experts to be a feature of Trump’s way of working. 

COVID-19 has complicated the global political landscape. But the partisanship and polarisation on which populist politics thrives has not gone away. 

  • These partisan divides tend to be sharpest in the USA, especially in terms of perceptions of the threat posed by the virus: Democrats are significantly more concerned about COVID-19 than Republicans, while belief that the media has exaggerated the outbreak is widespread among Republicans.
  • There are also substantial partisan divides in evaluations of the handling of the pandemic by PMs Conte, Johnson and Morrison, and President Trump. Only in Australia do a majority of both government and opposition party supporters think that the government’s leader is handling the coronavirus well.

Quotes

Professor Will Jennings, Principal Investigator of the TrustGov project at the University of Southampton said:

These findings make clear that the public notices and responds to how government is handling the coronavirus crisis – and the threat it poses to us. Competence matters for trust in political leaders, though the presence of deep partisan divides highlights how politics as usual continues even in times of existential crisis.

Professor Mark Evans, Director of Democracy 2025 at the Museum of Australian Democracy said:

Public trust as a political resource is particularly important in times of coronavirus. Without it the changes to public behaviour necessary to contain and ultimately prevent the spread of infection are slower and more resource intensive. People need to trust the government to support more government intervention that makes a difference.

Professor Gerry Stoker, Coinvestigator of the TrustGov Project at the University of Southampton and Chair in Governance at the University of Canberra said:

Populist politics has had a good decade but our survey suggests that in a crisis people value politicians who are competent and deliver more effective management of a real and significant threat. It is possible that the pandemic represents a turning point for democratic politics.

Ben Page, Chief Executive of Ipsos MORI said:

Competence is politically sexy again with people being more positive towards those politicians who utilise expert advice. Although the divides on which populism has thrived are still there and haven’t gone away in this latest crisis those politicians who have been consistent, calm and clear have performed best

Technical note:

Ipsos MORI interviewed a nationally representative sample of more than a thousand adults in each of Australia, Italy, the UK and US in May and June 2020. The exact fieldwork dates and sample sizes for each country can be found in the table below.

Country Fieldwork Sample
Australia 28 May - 15 June* 1,061
Italy 21-22 May 1,134
UK 18-19 May 1,167
USA 19-23 May 1,150


* The main fieldwork (N = 1051) ran from 28th May to 5th June, with a top-up sample (N = 267) added from 5th to 15th June.

The author(s)

  • Ben Page Chief Executive, Ipsos MORI
  • Keiran Pedley Public Affairs

More insights about Culture