Support remains strong for the junior doctors, and the government seen to be most at fault for the ongoing dispute
Two thirds still support the doctors’ cause, as round two of strikes gets underway
Majority think the government is more at fault for the ongoing dispute
Public support for the second round of the junior doctors’ strike is as high as it was for the first strikes in January, new polling from Ipsos MORI has found. The survey of 847 adults in England finds the same proportion (66%) supporting junior doctors striking as for the previous strike in January. Furthermore this support has strengthened, with a eight percentage point rise in the proportion strongly supporting the doctors in the dispute (from 41% in January to 49% now).
Despite this sustained support, there has been a slight rise in those opposing the strike, from 16% in January to 22% now. Opinions have polarised here as well with more strongly opposing the strikes now than for the previous strike (8% up to 14% in February).
Junior doctors are planning their second strike tomorrow, and Ipsos MORI’s second wave of figures shows that the government is bearing a lot of the blame for this ongoing dispute.
Two-thirds (64%) say that the government is more at fault for the dispute continuing this long, while just 13% say the junior doctors are more at fault. Nearly a fifth (18%) believe that they are both equally at fault.
- Download the data tables (PDF)
- Download the charts (PDF)
- View the data from the January strikes here
Commenting on the findings, Anna Quigley, Head of Health Research at Ipsos MORI, said:
“These figures show that the ongoing nature of the junior doctors’ dispute is harming the government more than the doctors. We know that doctors are among the most trusted individuals in society, and this dispute appears to have done little to dent this trust. Despite this, the junior doctors need to avoid ramping up the confrontation – the small rise in those opposing the strikes since January is marginal, but combined with our January finding of support falling if emergency care is withdrawn, it demonstrates that the doctors need to be careful not to jeopardise the public’s good will.”
- The polling was conducted in conjunction with the Health Service Journal.
- Ipsos MORI interviewed a representative sample of 847 adults in England, aged 18+. Interviews were conducted over the telephone between 5 and 7 February 2016. Quotas were set and the data are weighted to match the profile of the population.
One in three people in Scotland live in homes that do not meet the Living Home Standard
Created in 2016, The Living Home Standard represents what ‘home’ means, and what an acceptable home should provide. It has been defined by the public, for the public. This year, the study has been repeated, measuring the proportion of people living in homes that pass and fail the Living Home Standard in Scotland.