Residents See The Benefit In Hosting The Olympics

Residents of cities due to host, or potentially bidding to host, the Olympic Games are in favour of the event. New research by MORI for SportAccord shows a majority of the people whose lives will be affected the most support holding the biggest international sporting event in their hometown.

Residents of cities due to host, or potentially bidding to host, the Olympic Games are in favour of the event. New research by MORI for SportAccord shows a majority of the people whose lives will be affected the most support holding the biggest international sporting event in their hometown.

Seven in 10 Londoners (70%) believe there would be long-term social benefits to hosting the 2012 Olympic Games [1]. Furthermore the research also shows that public opinion in China for the 2008 Beijing Olympics is extremely positive -- 86% of those polled agree the event would bring social benefits to the Beijing area [2].

MORI's research reveals that around three in five (56%) residents of the North West of England feel the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester helped improve the quality of life in the area [3]. The positive effects on the local economy, transport facilities, infrastructure and an increased investment in the region are the specific benefits identified in the research [4].

Peter Hasler, Head of Sport Research at MORI, will be presenting the research at SportAccord, the International Sports Convention taking place from 12-16 May. He says: "The research is indicative of just how positive opinion is in the UK and China for hosting the Olympics. The results from the Manchester area prove that high profile international events can leave a long lasting and sustainable legacy that benefits the area and its people."

Technical details

1, 3 & 4. MORI conducted the research by face-to-face interview in-home among 1,885 people between 3-7 April 2003. There were 191 sampling points throughout Great Britain. Data have been weighted to reflect the national profile.

4. MORI conducted the research by face-to-face interview in-home among 453 people in March 2003. People were interviewed in four cities in China -- Beijing (28% of the sample), Shanghai (31%), Guangzhou (25%) and Chengdu (16%).

Topline Results

Q1. How frequently, if at all, do you... a) watch sport, either on television or live at matches/events? b) participate in a sport or health and fitness activity?

 a)b)
 %%
Everyday84
At least 4 or 5 times a week85
At least 2 or 3 times a week1714
About once a week1713
At least once every 2 weeks52
At least once a month73
At least once every 2 months31
Less often1512
Never1944
Don't know*1

Q2. Which of the following statements, if any, to you agree with?

 AllMenWomen
 %%%
My mood is effected by whether a sports team I support wins or loses17268
I have no interest in sport9712
There is not enough coverage of sport on television and in the newspapers6102
When I meet my friends we almost always talk about sport16295
There is too much coverage of sport on television and in the newspapers151417
None202020

Q3. To what extent, if at all, do you think the 2002 Commonwealth Games have helped improve the quality of life for people living in Greater Manchester?

 %
A great deal17
A fair amount40
Not a lot25
Not at all6
Don't know13

Q4. Why do you say that?

Base: All Who Said A Great Deal/Fair Amount (108)

 %
Positive
Helped develop the local/regional economy23
Improve public facilities and infrastructure19
Improve transport facilities (e.g. road, rail, river etc.)10
Employment opportunities5
Generally improve people's lives8
Increased investment in the area16
Increased tourist trade5
Improved sports facilities6
Increased levels of physical activity among the public-
 
Negative
Traffic problems1
Money should be spent elsewhere-
Short term -- not long term benefit1
 
Others6
Don't know-

Q5. Why do you say that?

Base: All Who Said A Not A Lot / Not At All (57)

 %
Positive
Helped develop the local/regional economy-
Improve public facilities and infrastructure-
Improve transport facilities (e.g. road, rail, river etc.)-
Employment opportunities2
Generally improve people's lives-
Increased investment in the area-
Increased tourist trade-
Improved sports facilities8
Increased levels of physical activity among the public-
 
Negative
Traffic problems2
Money should be spent elsewhere10
Short term -- not long term benefit41
 
Others19
Don't know26

Q6. London will potentially bid to host the 2012 Olympic Games. If the Games were to come to London, to what extent do you agree or disagree that hosting the Games would have long-term social benefits to the people of London and the surrounding area?

 ALLLondon
Base(1,885)(194)
 %%
Strongly agree2031
Tend to agree4039
Neither agree nor disagree1717
Tend to disagree129
Strongly disagree54
Don't know61

Q7. what extent do you agree or disagree that investment in sport in your community will have the following impacts on your local community?

 Strongly agreeTend to agreeNeither / norTend to disagreeStrongly disagreeDon't know
 %%%%%%
Reduce crime1447131654
Make your community a safer place1141192054
Reduce drug related problems1037192275
Improve people's health27559622
Increase jobs for local people155616814
Improve the environment934292035
Make the are a better place to live1447201324

More insights about Culture

Society